↓ Skip to main content

What predicts performance during clinical psychology training?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Clinical Psychology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
What predicts performance during clinical psychology training?
Published in
British Journal of Clinical Psychology, November 2013
DOI 10.1111/bjc.12035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrina Scior, Caroline E. Bradley, Henry W. W. Potts, Katherine Woolf, Amanda C de C Williams

Abstract

While the question of who is likely to be selected for clinical psychology training has been studied, evidence on performance during training is scant. This study explored data from seven consecutive intakes of the UK's largest clinical psychology training course, aiming to identify what factors predict better or poorer outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 69 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 19%
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 55%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 10 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,386,856
of 21,986,946 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Clinical Psychology
#63
of 637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,319
of 209,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Clinical Psychology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,986,946 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them